Skypa-dee-doo-daa

My status

Subscribe to posts by email

Your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Frightening Thoughts

Today is the day of struggle,” former chief of the Latvian Communist Party Alfrēds Rubiks to a couple of hundred pensioners in Rīga, 1 May 2008.

Outbursts

Archive for the 'Society' Category

Maris Sants: Homophobia forced me out of Latvia

Posted in National Minorities, Society on July 5th, 2008

Anti-gay protesters at Riga pride in 2008
RIGA – The Open House blog at UK’s Independent newspaper published interesting entry from Maris Sants, a gay pastor who left Latvia for the UK last month. Sadly, his story isn’t unique. Public homosexuality is still seen as propaganda of sexual deviance here in Latvia.

Here’s what Maris writes:

Before I came out in 2002, the rumours about my sexuality had already had huge ramifications on my life. I was a pastor in the Latvian church and I had a column in the church newspaper and that was stopped. My weekly radio sermon was taken off the air, and I was kicked out of the cathedral I served in.

On 22 May 2002, I was ex-communicated from the church. Back then there were only three openly gay people in Latvia. My story was on the front pages of all the Latvian newspapers and I have suffered dozens of personal attacks since then. I have been verbally abused, spat at and physically attacked. Last year, two guys ambushed me as I went to baptise a child. Since then my sight started to deteriorate, which my doctor blamed squarely on the stress caused by the attacks.

Read the whole thing. On the photo: protesters against gay pride parade pile up at the fence at the November 11 Embankment in Riga in June 2008.

Share on Facebook

Piss off, you little wanker

Posted in Society on July 4th, 2008

Freedom to urinate RIGA – The shame of public urination has hit home. I can certainly understand a John Smith from Somewhereshire in the UK wanting to relieve himself at the Freedom Monument on his trip to the Latvian capital. I could even understand a guy from New Zealand who decided to turn up at the monument in the Borat bathing suit. But now, locals began flocking to take a leak at the monumental monument in the heart of our beloved capital. First, it was a subhuman non-citizen, Nikolai and then, a citizen of Latvia joined in the list of public “urinators,” earning a slap on, well, you get the idea.

Actually, aside from the Freedom Monument, public urination is part of Latvia’s culture, part of drunken peasant culture. I suppose when no one is looking, you could urinate at the building of the Cabinet of Ministers, or some ministry you don’t like - that of agriculture, perhaps, is the least popular at the moment. I’ve seen men walk out of temporary parked cars at the railroad crossing, cross the road, walk a few meters into the green, whip it out and piss like there’s no tomorrow. It tends to leave passing-by women with a deformed face. Near my humble house on the outskirts of Riga, a man facing the road was watering a huge tree.

Recently, an op-ed piece in Diena ironically called to fence off the Freedom Monument from any one wishing to exercise their natural needs at the beloved landmark. In Latvia, you see, people believe that freedom usually means setting up fences. But the problem is not in their disrespect of Milda, rather the chronic lack of toilets.

What should a drunk Latvian, Russian, Brit, etc. do when he found a certain pressure on the inner wall of his bladder - to paraphrase “Spies Like Us” - with no toilet in sight? Men tend to want to urinate on something. Male ego tends to urinate on something large. When you’re in Old Town, the Freedom Monument is the largest thing you see. Besides, it’s got the girl on top. So they urinate there.

Near the office where I occasionally find myself, I saw two men pissing inside a tunnel near the Akmens Tilts. Good for them as there’s no public restroom on this side of the river either. The town’s sleeping areas – Agenskalns, Sarkandaugava, Torņakalns, Borderaja are the worst in the number of public restrooms. Certainly, a smart man might buy a coffee at a coffee-shop to be able to use their facilities, but as the interior minister Mareks Segliņš reminded us recently, even Čiekurkanls doesn’t have a nice place to eat and, therefore, to pee.

If our city fathers – once they stop fighting over the next local government coalition – wanted to deter Johns Smiths from using the Freedom Monument as their personal john, they’d create a citywide stop ‘n’ pee natural relief system for pleasure of local and tourists alike.

Share on Facebook

Latvian Miserabilism Marches On

Posted in National Minorities, Soviet Past, identity on May 24th, 2008

RIGA – Latvian miserabilism wants company.

It’s not enough that Latvians dwell on the past, dipping into an abysmal well of self-loathing and victimization that is an integral part of the Latvian ethnic identity as folk songs and dances. Eighteen years after they own their own house, Latvians want former invaders to feel as miserable as they are. The government is calculating a bill of the Soviet occupation to send to the Kremlin. At the same time, bills aren’t being sent to Germans, Poles, and Swedes who occupied what was to become Latvia. I guess there are occupiers and then there are occupiers.

A notorious victim complex needs a scape-goat. Up until late 1930s, the blame was with the Germans, the long-time oppressor of ethnic Latvians that became a subject of many Latvian folk songs. Following the Soviet occupation, the victim complexed Latvians turned from hating Germans to hating Russians.

On one hand, Latvian intelligentsia takes an immense pleasure in self-loathing. On the other hand, this eternal, “nobody loves me,” “no one has a pity on us” motif is evident in today’s Latvia. It’s other people’s fault for their miserabilism. Always. It is a constantly resurfacing theme in the pubic discourse on government matters. “Look, they steal, they hate us, they are corrupt, but we are poor, we suffer and bear it.” The nation of Latvia strives on appeasement and misery. Facing up to the fact that some Latvians participated in the killing of the Jews during the war is tough because if you accept it, you can no longer claim you’re a victim of the circumstance, but a willing participant.

Compare their mentality with Russians.

Ridden by centuries of dictatorship rule, Russians learned to adjust for survival. When you’re fighting for survival, pragmatism takes precedence over principles. Russians who may not have bought into ideals of a bright, glorious, communistic paradise, still uttered allegiances to the Party in exchange for a better job or some kind of benefits. In the West, they’d be called “sellouts.” In Russia, it was a matter of survival. Principled people were shipped to Siberia, killed, or were forced to flee to the West. It’s similar for ethnic Russians in Latvia. Most of those who naturalized since independence sold out. They gave the expected answered on familiar questions without much faith in what they were saying.

It’s just bizness.

Russians well aware of the Stalin crimes. Even one of the most anti-Latvian newspapers in town, Chas, published several accounts of ethnic Russians being deported along with the Latvians during the Soviet occupation. I’ve yet to talk to any Russian who does not know about “the great resettlement of the people.” Or about the Stalin’s oppressions. It’s no wonder that in 1989, the Soviet government called the Soviet-German pact invalid from the moment of its signing. While some political forces in Russia would like to see that 1989 declaration repealed, it is unlikely to erase what Russians know about that period of history.

In this, Latvian miserabilism isn’t compatible with Russian mentality. Russians don’t dwell on the past. They hardly learn from it. They don’t intend to put on sackcloth and ashes, roaming around the world in a state of perpetual mourning – unless it’s for bizness purposes. Nor should they. The Victory Day celebration is now part of the new Russian national identity - it’s got little to do with the figure of Joseph Stalin himself. It’s accentuated in the Baltics because Russians here feel as if the government or the ethnocentrism of Latvians threatens their own ethnic identity in their attempt to remake local Russians into ethnic Latvians. While some Russians would hold Stalin’s portrait dear and near to their hearts, they are dying out. When new generations of Russians came to the monument that Friday, Stalin was replaced with the Russian tricolor. For the younger generation, it’s a rebirth of the new Russia and May 9 is an integral part of the new Russia’s national identity as much as the Patriotic War of 1812 against Napoleon’s France was part of the national identity until the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

Russians aren’t Germans. Their mentality isn’t European, no matter how much you try to make them to be. Baltic Russians have a chance to become European, but it will takes years if not centuries. Regardless, though, they will not develop a perpetual guilt complex similar to the one espoused by modern Germans, who feel guilty for the crimes of their fathers and grandfathers, nor will they subscribe the perpetual guilt complex of the ethnic Latvians. Russians appear to be pragmatic people after centuries of oppression and fighting for survival under czars, Bolsheviks, communists. Russians want to move on instead of living in the past as Latvians appear to.As any pragmatics, Russians want to make money, have good jobs, raise their children, live in peace, rather than bickering over how many Latvians were actually in the Arajs commando, or how many Russians acknowledge the occupation. Now is the time to shred miserabilism, roll up our sleeves, and press on to a future without forgetting the past.

Share on Facebook

Telechas

Posted in National Minorities on May 22nd, 2008

RIGA – Telegraf, Chas, Vesti Segonya - the Russian-language newspapers in Latvia all have a certain degree of bitterness toward this free, democratic country, where they’re published.

The latter two newspapers, however, are overflowing with poison that spills off their pages. Their readers, it seems, are mostly angry men and women who salivate at the thought of how the state discriminates Russians in Latvia. Some of those readers gathered at the Victory Day celebration earlier this month.

A news story in Chas on economy would usually entail some kind of citizenship angle seemingly irrelevant to the actual economic news. It frustrates a journalist. Chas openly supported the PCTVL party mostly of archain Stalinists that barely made it into the parliament after the 2006 elections. Ironically, the party hacks blamed the media for their losses.

I subscribe to the best of the worst Russian-language newspapers in Latvia, Telegraf. As a friend of mine described it, it is the most loyal newspaper of the three. It’s not ideal - it whines every once in a while, but it also contains interesting political and economic news, some exclusives, and avoids dwelling on issues like citizenship and language laws. After all, their status quo is likely to remain for years to come.

This morning Telegraf and Chas announced a merger. New newspaper is expected to be launched this August. Its format and name aren’t known yet. Although officially it is a merger, but in reality Telegraf’s taking over Chas. The Telegraf owner London resident millionaire Valery Belokon has bought more than half of the stock in the Chas publisher, Petit publishing house.

The Telegraf managing editor Tatyana Fast confirmed the merger news on the radio last night. However, it’s the bad news for the Chas editor Ksenya Zagovorskaya, who was incommunicado yesterday. After all, her days as the managing editor of the newspaper are counted.

I personally welcome the news. If the new project improves on the Telegraf’s take on news, it’ll make an interesting informative newspaper about Latvia for the local Russian community. And perhaps, will signify the end of PCTVL in the next elections and teach more loyalty toward the country the Russian community likes to call its home.

Share on Facebook